lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:32:26 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lyude <cpaul@...hat.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the
 drm-intel-fixes tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h

between commit:

  f403372658fc ("drm/i915/skl: Add support for the SAGV, fix underrun hangs")
  (which is a chery-pick of commit 656d1b89e5ff from the drm-intel tree)

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  62e0fb880123 ("drm/i915/skl: Update plane watermarks atomically during plane updates")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the drm-intel tree version) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ