linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] virtually mapped stacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2016 08:27:40 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] virtually mapped stacks

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:12 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>> > Andy Lutomirski (3):
>> >   fork: Add generic vmalloced stack support
>> >   dma-api: Teach the "DMA-from-stack" check about vmapped stacks
>> >   x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks
>>
>>
>> Hi Ingo-
>>
>> Is this a good format for this series?  Is there anything I need to do?
>
> It's all looking good to me - just needed a quiet moment to line it all up, as
> it's a bit risky all around.
>

Thanks!

I've rebased the rest of the pile onto tip:x86/asm (Brian's switch_to
changes conflicted a bit).  I'll test it a bit more, let the 0-day bot
chew on it a bit, and I'll email it out in a couple of days.