linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com as list for sunxi arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:56:47 +0200
From:   Corentin LABBE <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     wens@...e.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com as list for
 sunxi arch

On 24/08/2016 20:23, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 02:14:17PM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>> All discutions about sunxi architecture is done
>> on linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com.
>> This patch add it as list on drivers for this arch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index a306795..6254eb1 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -980,6 +980,7 @@ ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support
>>  M:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
>>  M:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
>>  L:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
>> +L:	linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
> 
> I don't want a mailing list hosted on google groups to be added to
> MAINTAINERS.

Why ?
Because I see already:
L:	xiyoulinuxkernelgroup@...glegroups.com (subscribers-only)
L:	open-iscsi@...glegroups.com
L:	kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
L:	linux-ntb@...glegroups.com
L:	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com

> 
> We can ask for one on kernel.org though if people feel like it's
> relevant. Nobody cared for a few years, so I guess it would be a no,
> but if others feel like it...
> 

I am not against one on kernel.org

Regards