lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:49:05 +0100
From:   Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Apple device properties

On Mon, 22 Aug, at 11:58:50AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> By the way, arch/x86/Kconfig says that "it is not possible to boot a
> mixed-mode enabled kernel via the EFI boot stub - a bootloader that
> supports the EFI handover protocol must be used".
> 
> Is this still correct? With all the mixed-mode support in head_64.S
> and eboot.c, I'm wondering what's missing?

Yes, that's still correct.

The EFI boot stub technically refers to the feature of having the
firmware load the kernel directly, without the use of a boot loader.

In that scenario you need the kernel and firmware to agree on a CPU
mode since the kernel has no way to figure out if it needs to switch
or not. Nor does it have a direct way to figure out what bitness the
firmware is.

[ Yes, technically we could add code to the EFI stub to detect the
  current mode and perform the switch, we just don't have anything
  like that right now ]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ