lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:55:37 +0300
From:   Rami Rosen <roszenrami@...il.com>
To:     Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
Cc:     cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, hannes@...xchg.org,
        dledford@...hat.com, liranl@...lanox.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
        jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com, haggaie@...lanox.com,
        corbet@....net, james.l.morris@...cle.com, serge@...lyn.com,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, matanb@...lanox.com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 3/3] rdmacg: Added documentation for rdmacg

Hi,

> +Whenever RDMA resource charing occurs, owner rdma cgroup is returned to
Should be: charging instead of charing

> +(b) Query resource limit:
> +cat /sys/fs/cgroup/rdma/2/rdma.max
> +#Output:
> +mlx4_0 uctx=max pd=max ah=2 mr=100 mw=max cq=max srq=max qp=10 flow=max
> +ocrdma1 uctx=1 pd=5 ah=1 mr=10 cq=10 srq=max qp=20 flow=max flow=max

Is this really so: double"flow=max" at the end of the ocrdma1 line?
(flow=max flow=max)

> +5-4. RDMA
> +
> +The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
> +of RDMA resources.
"of of" should be only a single "of"


> +         mlx4_1 uctx=1 ah=0 pd=1 cq=4 qp=4 mr=100 srq=0 flow=10
> +         ocrdma1 uctx=2 pd=2 ah=2 mr=20 mw=max cq=1 srq=1 qp=10 flow=10

Seems to be inconsistency here: in the first line you have qp=4
*before* srq=0, but in the second line you have qp=10 *after* srq=1.

Keep on the good work!

Regards,
Rami Rosen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ