linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] hwrng: amd: Rework of the amd768-hwrng driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:38:02 +0200
From:   LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To:     Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Cc:     mpm@...enic.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] hwrng: amd: Rework of the amd768-hwrng driver

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 02:56:38PM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Hi Corentin,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 02:16:35PM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> > This patch convert the hwrng interface used by amd768-rng to its new API
> > by replacing data_read()/data_present() by read().
> > 
> > Furthermore, Instead of having two global variable, it's better to use a
> > private struct. This will permit to remove amd_pdev variable.
> > 
> > Finally, Instead of accessing hw directly via pmbase, it's better to
> > access after ioport_map() via ioread32/iowrite32.
> 
> I was going to recommend a better $subject line, but now I see why it's
> vague. :(  I would recommend breaking this patch up into three:
> 
>   hwrng: amd - Access hardware via ioread32/iowrite32
>   hwrng: amd - Replace global variable with private struct
>   hwrng: amd - Convert to new hwrng read() API
> 

That was my first idea, but believed that it wasnt worth it.

Anyway I will do it.

Regards
LABBE Corentin