lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 28 Aug 2016 15:22:42 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     linux-cris-kernel@...s.com,
        Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cris-cryptocop: Apply another recommendation from "checkpatch.pl"

>>> There is plenty of room for at least &(*pj)->iop on the line before.
>>
>> This is true. - Do you prefer an other indentation approach here?
> 
> Very much.  Most of the kernel code puts as much information on a line as
> possible, unless there is a reason to do otherwise.  Then more of the code
> will fit on the screen at one time.

How do you think about to clarify such an implementation detail also
in a document like "CodingStyle"?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ