lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2016 17:42:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
cc:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] genirq: Generic chip: factorise code using
 irq_get_domain_generic_chip()

On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, Sebastian Frias wrote:
> @@ -350,10 +350,10 @@ irq_get_domain_generic_chip(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int hw_irq)
>  	int idx;
>  
>  	if (!dgc)
> -		return NULL;
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>  	idx = hw_irq / dgc->irqs_per_chip;
>  	if (idx >= dgc->num_chips)
> -		return NULL;
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

This is completely pointless churn. None of the existing callsites cares
about the error value. We can simply split out the guts into a static
function and keep the semantics for irq_get_domain_generic_chip.

I'll fix that up while applying it.

Thanks,

	tglx


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ