linux-kernel - [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 03 Sep 2016 02:56:48 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@...aro.org>,
        Doug Smythies <doug.smythies@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil

Hi Everyone,

This is a new version of the "iowait boost" series I posted a few weeks
ago.  Since the first two patches from that series have been reworked and
are in linux-next now, I've rebased this series on top of my linux-next
branch.

In addition to that I took the Doug's feedback into account in the
intel_pstate patches [2-3/4].

Please let me know what you think and if you can run some benchmarks you
care about and see if the changes make any difference (this way or another),
please do that and let me know what you've found.

Thanks,
Rafael