lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 05 Sep 2016 09:47:12 -0700
From:   Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@...il.com>
To:     Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net, jic23@...nel.org,
        knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net, wens@...e.org,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
        antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] iio: adc: add support for Allwinner SoCs ADC

On Monday, September 05, 2016 09:11:47 AM Quentin Schulz wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 09:07, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Nitpicks ahead.
> > 
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:05:05PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >> +	info->soc_specific = (struct soc_specific *)platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> > 
> > This line is still rather long. How about calling the field "data" and
> > the structure gpadc_data?
> > 
> 
> driver_data is coming from the platform_device_id
> (http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h#L498)
> so can't really change that.
> I could change the structure to gpadc_data, that would save me 2
> characters, still 13 characters above the 80 characters limit however.
> 
I think Maxime meant to change member "soc_specific" to "data" of type
struct gpadc_data

> >> +
> >> +	tzd = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(pdev->dev.parent, 0, info,
> >> +						   &sun4i_ts_tz_ops);
> > 
> > A comment on why you put the parent device structure and not the
> > device itself like you're doing on all the other calls in that probe
> > would be nice.
> > 
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Quentin
> 
> > Thanks!
> > Maxime
> > 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ