lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2016 00:47:33 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@....com>,
        Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pinctrl: Add SX150X GPIO Extender Pinctrl Driver

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:

> Since the I2C sx150x GPIO expander driver uses platform_data to managed
> the pins configurations, rewrite the driver as a pinctrl driver using
> pinconf to get pin configurations from DT.
>
> The pinctrl driver is functionnally as the gpio-only driver equivalent
> and can use DT for pinconf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>

Overall I'd say this is a nice rewrite. I'd like the following:

- Include Peter Rosin, Wei Chen, Roland Stigge and Vladimir
  Zapolskiy on subsequent posts
  (Added on To:) ideally I want Tested-by: tags from them
  to verify that it doesn't break their current set-ups
  (does it? Especially LPC32xx)

- We need a migration plan: everything that was selecting
  GPIO_SX150X before should now select this instead.
  Just let the Kconfig entry in the drivers/gpio/Kconfig select
  this new driver?

- Make sure it is a slot-in replacement. Else make sure it
  is.

- Delete the old sx150x driver from drivers/gpio in the same
  patch. I'd hate to maintain them side by side. If I apply this,
  the old one must go out at the same time. Conversely I can
  revert the patch and get the old driver back.

- Strangely I don't see refernces to this driver in any
  device tree. Are people not upstreaming their boards?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ