linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds-pca963x: add bindings to invert polarity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 06 Sep 2016 11:29:56 +0200
From:   Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
To:     Anders Darander <anders@...rgestorm.se>
Cc:     Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
        mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
        galak@...eaurora.org,
        Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-pca963x: add bindings to invert polarity

Hi Anders,

On ma, 2016-09-05 at 13:02 +0200, Anders Darander wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> * Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl> [160504 10:10]:
> > 
> > On 04-05-16 09:55, Anders Darander wrote:
> > > 
> > > * Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com> [160504 09:28]:
> > > > 
> > > > Please note that there has already been an attempt to add
> > > > the support for inverted output polarity to this driver and
> > > > related
> > > > discussion [1]. This thread remains quiet for around two weeks.
> > > Ah, nice coincidence! Unfortunately, I made the work earlier than
> > > his
> > > posting, otherwise I could have spent the time on somethinge
> > > else. ;)
> > Sorry to be so slacking with submitting this, I've been sitting on
> > it for 6
> > months now :) I just kept postponing in submitting it. But as they
> > say,
> > great minds, and all that.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Well, then I hope v2 of his patches comes along.
> 
> Any news on a v2?
> 
> Otherwise, could we agree on a dt binding for the inverted output,
> and
> look into merging that prior to the rest of the series? I'd like to
> get
> rid of my local patch... 
I almost forgotten about this bit, I'll read back on the mails and
check/verify my results/discussions from back then.

Thanks for bringing it up again!

Olliver

> 
> Cheers,
> Anders