lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:42:01 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
CC:     linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: cleanup pfn_t usage in track_pfn_insert()

On 09/06/2016 10:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Now that track_pfn_insert() is no longer used in the DAX path, it no
> longer needs to comprehend pfn_t values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/pat.c             |    4 ++--
>  include/asm-generic/pgtable.h |    4 ++--
>  mm/memory.c                   |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

A small nit. Should not the arch/x86/mm/pat.c changes be separated out
into a different patch ? Kind of faced little bit problem separating out
generic core mm changes to that of arch specific mm changes when going
through the commits in retrospect.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ