lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:34:38 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc:     Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soc: ti: Add ti_sci_pm_domains driver

On 8 September 2016 at 19:38, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
> Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> writes:
>
>> [...]
>>
>>>
>>> One more idea...
>>>
>>> Since you don't really have a domain (a group of devices), what you
>>> really have is each device having an independent power switch, so as Ulf
>>> suggested, what you really need is for all the devices to share the same
>>> set of runtime PM callbacks that call SCI.  The only difference is the
>>> unique ID.
>>>
>>> Rather than using all of genpd, you could also just use a pm_domain
>>> which is what genpd is built on top of (and also omap_device, which
>>> you're probably familiar with also.)
>>
>> Even if this would work as well, the downside would be that you need
>> to re-invent the parts related to the DT parsing, the probing/removal
>> and attaching/detaching of the device to the PM domain.
>>
>> You probably don't want to go there... :-)
>
> All you'd need to read from DT would be the device-specific ID for
> TI-SCI, and that could be done at bind time with a notifier.  The, in
> that same notifier, if a TI-SCI ID exists, it would get added to the
> pm_domain.
>
> Anyways, your original proposal is much preferred if it can work.  I'm
> just throwing out another option because I really don't like one genpd
> per device.

Okay, then we are in full agreement!

BTW, I have just been trying to convince other people working on
Rockchip SoCs, to also avoid using one genpd per device. Feel free to
join those discussions [1] as well. :-)

Kind regards
Uffe

[1]
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/1/377

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ