linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:15:51 -0300
From:   Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To:     luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc:     Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-dl@...is.sssup.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield()

On 09/09/2016 09:38 AM, luca abeni wrote:
> Then, the "since the remaining runtime goes to 0" part of my suggestion
> is wrong and the sentence should be rephrased in some other way.
> 
> Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying

Ack, maybe I was not precise enough, sorry... I was just talking about
the "since the remaining runtime goes to 0" part of your suggestion.

-- Daniel