[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:29:52 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Regulator probe
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:55:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 13:17 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What do you mean? Of course we should handle probe deferral if we
> > fail to get a resource like a GPIO. Are you trying to say that this
> > doesn't work for you?
> No, it doesn't.
> Fixed regulator probe is deferred:
> reg-fixed-voltage reg-fixed-voltage.0.auto: Failed to register
> regulator: -517
So the regulator probe *does* get deferred as expected...
> But:
> sdhci-pci 0000:00:01.3: No vmmc regulator found
> Code in sdhci driver is:
> ret = mmc_regulator_get_supply(mmc);
> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return ret;
>
> mmc_regulator_get_supply():
> ...
> mmc->supply.vmmc = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vmmc");
> mmc->supply.vqmmc = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vqmmc");
...and then we correctly report that the optional supply that isn't
mapped (as far as I remember) isn't there.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists