[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 19:25:46 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagannadh.teki@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@...icam.com>,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: dts: imx6q: Add Engicam i.CoreM6 Quad/Dual
initial support
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com> wrote:
> Why? can't we update iomux reg value any side effects or something.
Sure you can change it.
You were using 0x8000000 before and I assume you tested flexcan and it
worked well.
Putting 1b0b0 will keep the same setting, so no functional change.
Why did you select 0x1b020?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists