[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:11:00 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86/dumpstack: allow preemption in
show_stack_log_lvl() and dump_trace()
* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:04:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 14 ++++++--------
> >
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> >
> > > +static void *is_softirq_stack(unsigned long *stack);
> > > {
> >
> > FYI, this bit clearly wasn't build tested on 32-bit even once - I'm skipping this
> > patch.
>
> Argh, sorry about that. I did a lot of testing on 32-bit with this
> patch before. I guess I goofed somehow when I split up the patches.
No problem!
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists