lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 11 Sep 2016 14:41:39 +0200
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
        "Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@...ium.com>
Cc:     David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BISECTED REGRESSION] v4.8-rc: gpio-leds broken on OCTEON

Hi! On 25.08.2016 20:24, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:42:00AM -0500, Steven J. Hill wrote:
>> It is actually two patches that cause the breakage. The other is:
>>    commit e55aeb6ba4e8cc3549bff1e75ea1d029324bce21
>>    of/irq: Mark interrupt controllers as populated before initialisation
>> I needed to revert both of these in order to get MMC working on our 71xx and
>> 78xx boards. For our MMC, I got error messages from the MMC core of "Invalid
>> POWER GPIO" until I applied the second patch. I will have a fix worthy of
>> upstreaming today which will be posted today.
> 
> The below change works for me...
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-irq.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-irq.c
> index 5a9b87b..5fd57c2 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-irq.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-irq.c
> @@ -1618,6 +1618,7 @@ static int __init octeon_irq_init_gpio(
>  		pr_warn("Cannot allocate memory for GPIO irq_domain.\n");
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
> +	of_node_clear_flag(gpio_node, OF_POPULATED);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

This afaics wasn't merged and the discussion looks stalled. Was this
issue discussed elsewhere or even fixed in between? Just asking, because
this issue is on the list of regressions for 4.8.

Ciao, Thorsten

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ