linux-kernel - Re: virtio_blk: Less function calls in init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:10:09 +0200
From:   Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Minfei Huang <minfei.hmf@...baba-inc.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: virtio_blk: Less function calls in init_vq() after error
 detection

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:24:58 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> wrote:

> See, some of your patches are accepted, e.g. the memdup_user changes have usually
> been applied by most maintainers including myself. If maintainers won't take other change,
> please accept that. If you continue to waste peoples time by discussing "maybe" patches
> you actually risk that people will stop taking any patches from you including the "yes"
> ones.

FWIW, he already gained a place on my ignore list for pestering me
offline about his patches and not stopping even when told to do so. So
while I won't object if you choose to apply selected patches, I won't
comment on any and won't take any (hey, I even won't see them unless
someone else replies...)