linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] AT91: sckc improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:46:42 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] AT91: sckc improvements

On 09/08, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patch set improves the slow clock controller driver.
> 
> The first patch simply moves some code around to avoid having extern
> functions declared.
> 
> The second patch adds support for the SCKC found on sama5d4 and later.
> It is notably missing the OSC32EN bit.
> The third and fourth patches make use of this new driver (DT ABI is not
> broken \o/)
> 
> Finally, there is an optimization. Trying to find wether the slow
> oscillator is already stable to avoid waiting 1.2s twice in the boot
> process.

clk patches look ok. We'll need to move this to use clk_hw
registration based APIs some time, but that isn't critical to
handle now. Will you resend?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project