linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] mfd: tps65218: Clean ups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Sep 2016 18:36:20 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Keerthy <a0393675@...com>
Cc:     Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, lee.jones@...aro.org, tony@...mide.com,
        dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        gnurou@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, t-kristo@...com,
        russ.dill@...com, d-gerlach@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] mfd: tps65218: Clean ups

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 09:51:38PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> On Friday 16 September 2016 07:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 05:12:38PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:

> > > Should i repost this series? I do not see this series in linux-next yet.

> > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> > for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so

> I should have been clearer.
> The last Lee Jones conveyed that:

> "I can't take this series yet, since it relies on a change which was
> taken into Mark's Regulator tree"

> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/31/312

> So wanted to check if i needed to re-base/repost this series again.
> Sorry about the confusion i think that is because of $Subject goof up in the
> 0th patch of the series.

I'm afraid I've no real idea what this series is about or what patches
it might depend on, sorry.  If you're waiting for me to do something
you'll need to tell me what it is but if it's a dependency that needs
cross merging then reposting this series isn't going to be needed.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)