linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] staging: lustre: lustre/ldlm: Fixed sparse warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1609192143150.21894@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:43:36 +0100 (BST)
From:   James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:     Nayeemahmed Badebade <itachi.opsrc@...il.com>
cc:     andreas.dilger@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        oleg.drokin@...el.com, bruce.korb@...il.com,
        lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: lustre: lustre/ldlm: Fixed sparse warnings


> Added __acquires / __releases sparse locking annotations
> to lock_res_and_lock() and unlock_res_and_lock() functions
> in l_lock.c, to fix below sparse warnings:
> 
> l_lock.c:47:22: warning: context imbalance in 'lock_res_and_lock' - wrong count at exit
> l_lock.c:61:6: warning: context imbalance in 'unlock_res_and_lock' - unexpected unlock
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nayeemahmed Badebade <itachi.opsrc@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>

> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
>  * Corrected sparse annotations for the lock
>    lock->l_resource->lr_lock
> 
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/l_lock.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/l_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/l_lock.c
> index ea8840c..3845f38 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/l_lock.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/l_lock.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
>   * being an atomic operation.
>   */
>  struct ldlm_resource *lock_res_and_lock(struct ldlm_lock *lock)
> +				__acquires(&lock->l_lock)
> +				__acquires(&lock->l_resource->lr_lock)
>  {
>  	spin_lock(&lock->l_lock);
> 
> @@ -59,6 +61,8 @@ struct ldlm_resource *lock_res_and_lock(struct ldlm_lock *lock)
>   * Unlock a lock and its resource previously locked with lock_res_and_lock
>   */
>  void unlock_res_and_lock(struct ldlm_lock *lock)
> +		__releases(&lock->l_resource->lr_lock)
> +		__releases(&lock->l_lock)
>  {
>  	/* on server-side resource of lock doesn't change */
>  	ldlm_clear_res_locked(lock);
> --
> 1.9.1
> 
>