linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] iommu/amd: Clean up patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:07:32 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dyoung@...hat.com, xlpang@...hat.com, Vincent.Wan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] iommu/amd: Clean up patches

On 09/19/16 at 04:20pm, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:50:49PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > These were found out when I tried to fix the kdump failure on system
> > with AMD iommu. Pack them into this patchset since they are not related
> > to the kdump issue and each other.
> > 
> > Baoquan He (4):
> >   iommu/amd: clean up the cmpxchg64 invocation
> >   iommu/amd: Use standard bitmap operation to set bitmap
> >   iommu/amd: Free domain id when free a domain of struct dma_ops_domain
> >   iommu/amd: No need to wait iommu completion if no dte irq entry change
> 
> I applied patches 1-3, but patch 4 had some conflicts. Can you please
> rebase this patch to my x86/amd branch and resend?

Finished, please try the resent post.

Thanks
Baoquan