linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 017/192] [PATCH 017/135] clk: xgene: Fix divider with non-zero shift value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:07:18 -0700
From:   Loc Ho <lho@....com>
To:     Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 017/192] [PATCH 017/135] clk: xgene: Fix divider with
 non-zero shift value

Hi,

>> 4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> ------------------
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 1382ea631ddddb634850a3795527db0feeff5aaf ]
>>
>> The X-Gene clock driver missed the divider shift operation when
>> set the divider value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Loc Ho <lho@....com>
>> Fixes: 308964caeebc ("clk: Add APM X-Gene SoC clock driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c |    3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c
>> @@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ static int xgene_clk_set_rate(struct clk
>>               /* Set new divider */
>>               data = xgene_clk_read(pclk->param.divider_reg +
>>                               pclk->param.reg_divider_offset);
>> -             data &= ~((1 << pclk->param.reg_divider_width) - 1);
>> +             data &= ~((1 << pclk->param.reg_divider_width) - 1)
>> +                             << pclk->param.reg_divider_shift;
> [...]
>
> This still does the wrong thing when the shift value is non-zero: it
> clears all bits to the right of the divider field in data.  I think the
> correct assignment is:
>
>                 data &= ~(((1 << pclk->param.reg_divider_width) - 1)
>                           << pclk->param.reg_divider_shift);
>

Yes... There was an later patch that address this -
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8458361

-Loc