linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Ajust lockdep static allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:12:46 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Babu Moger <babu.moger@...cle.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, tj@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Ajust lockdep static allocations

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:43:34AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote:
> These patches adjust the static allocations for lockdep
> data structures used for debugging locking correctness. The current
> code reserves about 4MB extra space for these data structures. Most
> of the configurations do not need these many data structures. While
> testing, I have not seen it go beyond 20% of already reserved entries.
> 
> $grep "lock-classes" /proc/lockdep_stats
> 	lock-classes:                          1560 [max: 8191]
> 
> Reserving even more space seems unreasonable. So, keeping the default
> entries small as before the Commit 1413c0389333 ("lockdep: Increase static
> allocations"). Added new CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING_PLUS in case someone
> needs more entries to debug their large configuration.

Why make this more complicated? There's absolutely no upside to this
change as far as I can see.