linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/118] 4.4.22-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:21:42 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Holger Hoffstätte 
        <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/118] 4.4.22-stable review

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:43:27AM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 09/23/16 10:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> >> did you forget to add the -net patches in stable-queue.git/tree/net-4.4
> >> or are they on hold for some reason? I think they were supposed to go
> >> into .22.
> > 
> > Really?  I just put them there as I was pondering applying them, waiting
> > for the network maintainer to send me some more patches, or not.  They
> 
> Ahh..alright then.
> 
> > Why do you think they should go into this release?
> 
> Never mind - they are not really urgent. I just had most of them merged
> locally already and was just wondering.

If you have them merged, and tested, mind sending them to me with your
tested-by mark on them?  That way I know they work and can focus on the
ones that will require backporting effort.

thanks,

greg k-h