| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:04:31 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 01/73] include/linux/kernel.h: change abs() macro so it uses consistent return type
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
commit 8f57e4d930d48217268315898212518d4d3e0773 upstream.
Rewrite abs() so that its return type does not depend on the
architecture and no unexpected type conversion happen inside of it. The
only conversion is from unsigned to signed type. char is left as a
return type but treated as a signed type regradless of it's actual
signedness.
With the old version, int arguments were promoted to long and depending
on architecture a long argument might result in s64 or long return type
(which may or may not be the same).
This came after some back and forth with Nicolas. The current macro has
different return type (for the same input type) depending on
architecture which might be midly iritating.
An alternative version would promote to int like so:
#define abs(x) __abs_choose_expr(x, long long, \
__abs_choose_expr(x, long, \
__builtin_choose_expr( \
sizeof(x) <= sizeof(int), \
({ int __x = (x); __x<0?-__x:__x; }), \
((void)0))))
I have no preference but imagine Linus might. :] Nicolas argument against
is that promoting to int causes iconsistent behaviour:
int main(void) {
unsigned short a = 0, b = 1, c = a - b;
unsigned short d = abs(a - b);
unsigned short e = abs(c);
printf("%u %u\n", d, e); // prints: 1 65535
}
Then again, no sane person expects consistent behaviour from C integer
arithmetic. ;)
Note:
__builtin_types_compatible_p(unsigned char, char) is always false, and
__builtin_types_compatible_p(signed char, char) is also always false.
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 9 +++----
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/calib.c | 2 -
include/linux/kernel.h | 36 +++++++++++++++----------------
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
@@ -433,16 +433,15 @@ ssize_t iio_format_value(char *buf, unsi
scale_db = true;
case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO:
if (vals[1] < 0)
- return sprintf(buf, "-%ld.%06u%s\n", abs(vals[0]),
- -vals[1],
- scale_db ? " dB" : "");
+ return sprintf(buf, "-%d.%06u%s\n", abs(vals[0]),
+ -vals[1], scale_db ? " dB" : "");
else
return sprintf(buf, "%d.%06u%s\n", vals[0], vals[1],
scale_db ? " dB" : "");
case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO:
if (vals[1] < 0)
- return sprintf(buf, "-%ld.%09u\n", abs(vals[0]),
- -vals[1]);
+ return sprintf(buf, "-%d.%09u\n", abs(vals[0]),
+ -vals[1]);
else
return sprintf(buf, "%d.%09u\n", vals[0], vals[1]);
case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL:
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/calib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/calib.c
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ static void iwlagn_gain_computation(stru
/* bound gain by 2 bits value max, 3rd bit is sign */
data->delta_gain_code[i] =
min(abs(delta_g),
- (long) CHAIN_NOISE_MAX_DELTA_GAIN_CODE);
+ (s32) CHAIN_NOISE_MAX_DELTA_GAIN_CODE);
if (delta_g < 0)
/*
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -202,26 +202,26 @@ extern int _cond_resched(void);
/**
* abs - return absolute value of an argument
- * @x: the value. If it is unsigned type, it is converted to signed type first
- * (s64, long or int depending on its size).
+ * @x: the value. If it is unsigned type, it is converted to signed type first.
+ * char is treated as if it was signed (regardless of whether it really is)
+ * but the macro's return type is preserved as char.
*
- * Return: an absolute value of x. If x is 64-bit, macro's return type is s64,
- * otherwise it is signed long.
+ * Return: an absolute value of x.
*/
-#define abs(x) __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(x) == sizeof(s64), ({ \
- s64 __x = (x); \
- (__x < 0) ? -__x : __x; \
- }), ({ \
- long ret; \
- if (sizeof(x) == sizeof(long)) { \
- long __x = (x); \
- ret = (__x < 0) ? -__x : __x; \
- } else { \
- int __x = (x); \
- ret = (__x < 0) ? -__x : __x; \
- } \
- ret; \
- }))
+#define abs(x) __abs_choose_expr(x, long long, \
+ __abs_choose_expr(x, long, \
+ __abs_choose_expr(x, int, \
+ __abs_choose_expr(x, short, \
+ __abs_choose_expr(x, char, \
+ __builtin_choose_expr( \
+ __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), char), \
+ (char)({ signed char __x = (x); __x<0?-__x:__x; }), \
+ ((void)0)))))))
+
+#define __abs_choose_expr(x, type, other) __builtin_choose_expr( \
+ __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), signed type) || \
+ __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(x), unsigned type), \
+ ({ signed type __x = (x); __x < 0 ? -__x : __x; }), other)
/**
* reciprocal_scale - "scale" a value into range [0, ep_ro)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists