linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v19 05/12] fpga-mgr: add fpga image information struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2016 23:34:51 -0500
From:   Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>
To:     Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
Cc:     Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
        Walter Goossens <waltergoossens@...e.nl>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Cyril Chemparathy <cyril.chemparathy@...inx.com>,
        Josh Cartwright <joshc@...com>,
        Matthew Gerlach <mgerlach@...nsource.altera.com>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 05/12] fpga-mgr: add fpga image information struct

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Moritz Fischer
<moritz.fischer@...us.com> wrote:
Hi Moritz,

> Hi Alan,
>
> generally ok with the change.

Cool!

>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com> wrote:
>
>> -int fpga_mgr_buf_load(struct fpga_manager *mgr, u32 flags, const char *buf,
>> -                     size_t count)
>> +int fpga_mgr_buf_load(struct fpga_manager *mgr, struct fpga_image_info *info,
>> +                     const char *buf, size_t count)
>
> Doesn't this break the both socfpga and zynq if [6/12] and [7/12] are
> not part of this commit?
> i.e shouldn't 5,6 and 7 be a single commit?

Yeah, squashing those would improve bisectability.

Alan
aka atull

>
> Cheers,
> Moritz