lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:33:04 +0800 From: wei.guo.simon@...il.com To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@...il.com>, Chris Smart <chris@...troguy.com>, Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@...il.com>, Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>, Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@...il.com>, Jack Miller <jack@...ezen.org>, Rashmica Gupta <rashmicy@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v15 15/15] selftests/powerpc: Fix a build issue From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Fixes the following build failure - cp_abort.c:90:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) { ^ cp_abort.c:90:3: note: use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or -std=gnu11 to compile your code cp_abort.c:97:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) { Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@...il.com> Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@...il.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c index 5a5b55a..1ce7dce 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ int test_cp_abort(void) /* 128 bytes for a full cache line */ char buf[128] __cacheline_aligned; cpu_set_t cpuset; - int fd1[2], fd2[2], pid; + int fd1[2], fd2[2], pid, i; char c; /* only run this test on a P9 or later */ @@ -87,14 +87,14 @@ int test_cp_abort(void) FAIL_IF(pid < 0); if (!pid) { - for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) { FAIL_IF((write(fd1[WRITE_FD], &c, 1)) != 1); FAIL_IF((read(fd2[READ_FD], &c, 1)) != 1); /* A paste succeeds if CR0 EQ bit is set */ FAIL_IF(paste(buf) & 0x20000000); } } else { - for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) { FAIL_IF((read(fd1[READ_FD], &c, 1)) != 1); copy(buf); FAIL_IF((write(fd2[WRITE_FD], &c, 1) != 1)); -- 1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists