linux-kernel - Re: KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:25:34 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Bornträger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Walter Harms <wharms@....de>
Subject: Re: KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating code

>> * Does there really a probability remain that an inappropriate product
>>   would be calculated here (as the situation was before my two update steps
>>   for this software module)?
> 
> Perhaps not. Hence my "Probably not an issue here, ...".

Thanks for your clarification.


>> * Can it be that you are looking for a variant of a function like "memdup_user"
>>   where values can be passed as separate parameters "count" and "size" so that
>>   the needed multiplication and corresponding overflow check would be performed
>>   together as desired?
> 
> If there are enough uses, and people like it, adding memdup_user_array()
> may be a good idea...

How are the chances of such an addition for the Linux programming interface?


> P.S. Why do your questions make me think of a scientific paper? ;-)

Would you like to recommend any for further reading?   ;-)

Regards,
Markus