lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:30:01 +0000
From:   Cory Pruce <cpruce@...iper.net>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
CC:     Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com>,
        "minchan@...nel.org" <minchan@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Zram for FreeBSD

Cool, I am starting to get a good grasp on what is going on (I’ll probably need to use FreeBSD’s archive.h as opposed to Linux’s crypto.h). I am trying to get a hold on what exactly I need to port to FreeBSD. I see that (as Nitin suggested) zsmalloc is the main brains of handling the objects and that it creates a fixed amount of sharded “pages” which a compressed (or uncompressed) actual page can span. I see also that that depends on zpool. 

I will probably find all “dependencies”; however, if one of you could describe the components used/implemented for this, that’d be awesome. Also, any linux specific setup/layout details come to mind?

Seriously, any details would be appreciated. It will save me time.

Thanks,
Cory

On 10/5/16, 9:43 PM, "Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> wrote:

    Hi,
    
    On (10/05/16 16:47), Cory Pruce wrote:
    >    Could one of you tell me why these compression algo’s were chosen,
    
    zram supports more than that.
    https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146469777105130
    
    
    >    if they were implemented as a need for zram, and
    
    hm... not all of them (if any at all). lzo, *may be*, was motivated
    by "compression/decompression perfromance VS compression ratio", which
    is imporatant for zram.
    
    
    >    what the policy is on porting these to FreeBSD?
    
    no idea.
    
    	-ss
    


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ