linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:41:18 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>
Cc:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, nm@...com,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, robh@...nel.org,
        broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support

On 10-10-16, 14:20, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Cool, I'm reviewing these patches still but I definitely plan to test them
> out on the TI platforms requiring multi-regulator support. At first glance
> it looks like it does give us the hooks we need. I believe we can use
> cpufreq-dt as is and just provide the regulators before it probes.

Yes you can. That's how I tested it as well.

-- 
viresh