linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:04:02 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't touch single threaded PTEs which are on the right
 node

> >  	do {
> >  		oldpte = *pte;
> > @@ -94,6 +100,13 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> >  				/* Avoid TLB flush if possible */
> >  				if (pte_protnone(oldpte))
> >  					continue;
> > +
> > +				/*
> > +				 * Don't mess with PTEs if page is already on the node
> > +				 * a single-threaded process is running on.
> > +				 */
> > +				if (target_node == page_to_nid(page))
> > +					continue;
> >  			}
> >  
> 
> Check target_node != NUMA_NODE && target_node == page_to_nid(page) to
> avoid unnecessary page->flag masking and shifts?

I didn't do this last change because I expect a potentially mispredicted
check is more expensive than some shifting/masking.

-Andi