linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/cpufeature: Add AVX512_4VNNIW and AVX512

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:55:10 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        piotr.luc@...el.com, luto@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com,
        hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/cpufeature: Add AVX512_4VNNIW and AVX512_4FMAPS
 features

On Sun, 16 Oct 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > The spec can be found in Intel Software Developer Manual or in
> > Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference. See
> > https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/69/78/319433-025.pdf.
> 
> > +/* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (edx), word 18 */
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4VNNIW  (18*32+2) /* AVX-512 Neural Network Instructions */
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_AVX512_4FMAPS  (18*32+3) /* AVX-512 Multiply Accumulation Single precision */
> 
> This is getting ridiculous: we keep adding new leafs to
> ->x86_capability, thus bloating cpuinfo_x86 but then it is not even
> worth it - this patch defines only two bits.

What's worse is that the Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference
manual says:

CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=0):EDX[bit 02] AVX512_4FMAPS
CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=0):EBX[bit 03] AVX512_4VNNIW

So AVX512_4VNNIW is in EBX not EDX. What's correct here? The manual or the patch?

I'm going to zap it.

Thanks,

	tglx