lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2016 01:47:24 +0200
From:   Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
        Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>,
        Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/28] drm: avoid uninitialized timestamp use in
 wait_vblank

On 10/18/2016 12:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc warns about the timestamp in drm_wait_vblank being possibly
> used without an initialization:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c: In function 'drm_crtc_send_vblank_event':
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:992:24: error: 'now.tv_usec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:1069:17: note: 'now.tv_usec' was declared here
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:991:23: error: 'now.tv_sec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>
> This can happen if drm_vblank_count_and_time() returns 0 in its
> error path. To sanitize the error case, I'm changing that function
> to return a zero timestamp when it fails.
>
> Fixes: e6ae8687a87b ("drm: idiot-proof vblank")
> Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> First submitted in January 2016, second submission in February,
> the patch is still required.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> index b969a64..48a6167 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> @@ -952,8 +952,10 @@ static u32 drm_vblank_count_and_time(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
>  	u32 vblank_count;
>  	unsigned int seq;
>
> -	if (WARN_ON(pipe >= dev->num_crtcs))
> +	if (WARN_ON(pipe >= dev->num_crtcs)) {
> +		*vblanktime = (struct timeval) { 0 };
>  		return 0;
> +	}
>
>  	do {
>  		seq = read_seqbegin(&vblank->seqlock);
>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@...il.com>

-mario

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ