Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:15:36 +0200
From:   Ove Bjørn Karlsen <epost@...ebeneficience.net>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kildall

Den 10/16/2016 22:41, skrev jdow:
> On 2016-10-16 13:12, Ove Bjørn Karlsen wrote:
>> Den 10/15/2016 23:19, skrev jdow:
>>> On 2016-10-15 05:31, Ove Bjørn Karlsen wrote:
>>>> Den 10/6/2016 10:37, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>>>> Den 10/3/2016 17:10, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>>>>> Den 10/3/2016 14:29, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>>>>>> I tried Linux in 2010, with the peak of the Ubuntu distribution, 
>>>>>>> Karmic
>>>>>>> Koala. And soon compiled my own kernel for it.  But little 
>>>>>>> recognition of my
>>>>>>> later low-jitter work it would seem. (That actually removed all 
>>>>>>> "disk read"
>>>>>>> stops, from high-performance demanding games like Doom 3. 
>>>>>>> Enabling a fluent
>>>>>>> 3x72 fps, since the engine does 3 passes pr. frame.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like 
>>>>>>> Microsoft
>>>>>>> could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was some 
>>>>>>> real issue,
>>>>>>> some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have 
>>>>>>> been the Bill
>>>>>>> Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M
>>>>>>> (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied 
>>>>>>> as MS-DOS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I analyse this, it seems american nationalism is at work. 
>>>>>>> Gary Kildall
>>>>>>> had parents of Norwegian and Swedish heritage. Yet few here in 
>>>>>>> Norway even
>>>>>>> seems to be aware of the "real" Bill Gates. While many know the 
>>>>>>> enthusiast
>>>>>>> computing environment have had their brilliant people.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When it comes to the discussion of "Microsoft Business 
>>>>>>> Practises", one
>>>>>>> should definately read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kildall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is what it really ultimately is about. MS-DOS later even 
>>>>>>> admitted to
>>>>>>> have "CP/M source" in the sourcetree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like I had to leave GNU support due to its obscurity, I have to 
>>>>>>> leave "MS"
>>>>>>> support for the same.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Things Have To Be Done Right, and if anyone could do that, maybe 
>>>>>>> some new OS
>>>>>>> have a chance :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My view of a "good OS", is a high-level low-jitter optimized 
>>>>>>> innerloop
>>>>>>> construct, based on possily just-in-time interpretated language, 
>>>>>>> making most
>>>>>>> of the OS language one, and usable by newbies and advanced, that 
>>>>>>> might make
>>>>>>> assembly aswell. Where often used library macros could 
>>>>>>> ultimately be made in
>>>>>>> H/W and accelerated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you are a brilliant programmer indeed, in the US, salute the 
>>>>>>> flag, and be
>>>>>>> american supergun... :|
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or.. make a music video: 
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odHUlDm6O-U
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peaceful Saluations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So to really say what I am thinking.. A Good OS Obeys 
>>>>>> Metaphysical Laws.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of Paradox Theos, or the culturally correct corresponding 
>>>>>> concept. (Probably
>>>>>> not so much "god", but the original Gotan probably was that.)
>>>>>> .                                  .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peaceful Salutations.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I also wrote this:
>>>>> https://medium.com/@Stage_Mind/the-metaphysical-realities-of-a-good-low-jitter-operating-system-93e7b248e458#.gitf5ib10 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Just to be a little bit crazy, if the remotest chance of anyone 
>>>> wanting me to
>>>> work with this, and finance it, I would.
>>>>
>>>> RightOS by Admirers Of Paradox Theos. Some of the most intelligen 
>>>> men in the
>>>> world who respect the metaphysical might pull this off. And fix so 
>>>> many
>>>> obscurities we find with the modern internet.
>>>>
>>>> Peaceful Salutations.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just off hand after between 15 and 20 years monitoring the LKML the 
>>> fellows
>>> here didn't bother to read the rant. And incidentally, Gary Kildall 
>>> was an
>>> American first with ancestors from your neck of the woods. He spoke 
>>> American
>>> English with no more accent than a few stiff drinks might cause. I 
>>> met him at
>>> a computer convention many years ago and had the chance to chatter 
>>> with him.
>>> So if you're getting all national pride, you're being a little 
>>> silly. Next
>>> time approach it without the rant. It might get a better reception. 
>>> This group
>>> does NOT go for demonstrations of ego in the code or newbie coders.
>>>
>>> {^_^}
>>
>> I do not need to you speak of behalf of "the fellows". And, no, I am 
>> not a
>> newbie coder, I have done some of the worlds best DSP, beating all your
>> contemporary recordlabels, better kernel configs than most here, and the
>> philosophy I present is also better than all current Microsoft, 
>> Linux, CP/M etc,
>> that honestly, are all based in phallic totems, that can never really 
>> be truly
>> good.
>>
>> It is that point of intelligence, beyond phallic totems, that people 
>> truly
>> should reach for. However to become conscious of this, and actually 
>> do it, seems
>> hard, in a culture where 99% of it, seems phallic based, thought 
>> relevant to
>> mindreducing drugs, or citypromiscuity and liqour. And even it all is 
>> about sex
>> and ofcourse really children, many of these doesn´t even hit the mark 
>> there.
>>
>> I have gone there though, and made it simpler for the rest. Follow, 
>> Intelligent
>> People.
>>
>> My summary of research on religion has been top 1% research on 
>> Academia aswell,
>> and is available here: https://independent.academia.edu/OveKarlsen
>>
>> Peaceful Salutations
>>
>
> It's not me you have to convince. I'm more an observer than a 
> contributor, although there is a miniscule bit of my coding in the 
> pile of other people's contributions. I'm mostly just an interested 72 
> year old lady who tried to make an observation. Your emails bristle 
> with ego, rightly or wrongly. The kernel developers do not take kindly 
> to king size egos and tend to bruise them severely. They are very big 
> on proven contributions politely offered. And as far as this group 
> goes, you are a newbie according to the group's dynamics. You 
> contribute, you build your reputation, and eventually you're a full 
> blown contributor who is no longer a newbie. I was speaking of newbie 
> to the group not to coding in general.
>
> What does researching religion have to do with the price of tea on the 
> Moon let alone the LKML? At least you picked a topic that people 
> should be investigating these days. The first time I bounced on 
> examining that particular ideology may have your birth by a goodly 
> number of years. Every time I've looked at it since I've become more 
> disgusted with it. It's humanities collective suicide pact wrapped in 
> pig intestines and served up as sausage, which is totally enough said 
> about an odious topic.
>
> {^_^}

This is the kind of nutter who likes a phallic totem, guys. Is that the 
kind of company you would prefer? Obviously the internet truly needs a 
correct paradigm.

Peaceful Salutations,
Ove Bjørn Karlsen
AKA Admirer Of Paradox Theos.

PS: I am also testing my philosophy in pop culture: 
https://www.internetdj.com/user/1648283118719701_fb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists