linux-kernel - Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH] lib: harden strncpy_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:04:12 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH] lib: harden strncpy_from_user

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:57:58PM -0400, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > The strncpy_from_user() accessor is effectively a copy_from_user()
> > specialised to copy strings, terminating early at a NUL byte if
> > possible. In other respects it is identical, and can be used to copy an
> > arbitrarily large buffer from userspace into the kernel. Conceptually,
> > it exposes a similar attack surface.
> >
> > As with copy_from_user(), we check the destination range when the kernel
> > is built with KASAN, but unlike copy_from_user() we do not check the
> > destination buffer when using HARDENED_USERCOPY. As strncpy_from_user()
> > calls get_user() in a loop, we must call check_object_size() explicitly.
> >
> > This patch adds this instrumentation to strncpy_from_user(), per the
> > same rationale as with the regular copy_from_user(). In the absence of
> > hardened usercopy this will have no impact as the instrumentation
> > expands to an empty static inline function.

[...]

> Ah, yes, good catch! (And to repeat what you mentioned to me in
> passing in the hall: there appear to be other users of get_user() in a
> loop in other places in the kernel that will likely need some
> attention too.)

I was reminded of this as it just hit mainline; is it worth dropping a
TODO on the KSPP wiki? I suspect I won't have the time to delve much
further into this in the near term, and it might be a good intro task
for someone.

Thanks,
Mark.