linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] DAX: enable iostat for read/write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:55:53 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc:     "david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
        "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DAX: enable iostat for read/write

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-10-15 at 18:54 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:25:13AM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
>  :
>> > +static void dax_iostat_start(struct gendisk *disk, struct iov_iter
>> > *iter,
>> > +     unsigned long *start)
>> > +{
>> > +int rw = iov_iter_rw(iter);
>> > +int sec = iov_iter_count(iter) >> 9;
>> > +int cpu = part_stat_lock();
>> > +
>> > +*start = jiffies;
>> > +part_round_stats(cpu, &disk->part0);
>> > +part_stat_inc(cpu, &disk->part0, ios[rw]);
>> > +part_stat_add(cpu, &disk->part0, sectors[rw], sec);
>> > +part_inc_in_flight(&disk->part0, rw);
>> > +part_stat_unlock();
>> > +}
>>
>> Why reimplement generic_start_io_acct() and generic_end_io_acct()?
>
> It was modeled after __nd_iostat_start() / nd_iostart_end().  I agree
> that we can use generic_start_io_acct() and generic_end_io_acct() here.
>
> Should we also change the nd interface to use the generic version as
> well?

Yes, sounds good to me.