linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH resend 4.9] hw_random: Don't use a stack buffer in add_early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:03:17 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:     Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Matt Mullins <mmullins@...x.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 4.9] hw_random: Don't use a stack buffer in add_early_randomness()

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2016, 10:30:13 CEST schrieb Andy Lutomirski:
>
> Hi Andy,
>>
>> Sure, but shouldn't that be a separate patch covering the whole hw_crypto
>> core?
>
> I think that you are right -- there are many more cases where a memset(0) is
> warranted.
>
> Do you want to make this change or should I send a patch?

Can you do it?  I have my work cut out for me making sure that all the
known regressions get stomped quickly...