[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:10:32 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv3 3/6] printk: introduce per-cpu safe_print seq
buffer
On (10/18/16 12:46), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Returns with local IRQs disabled.
> > + * Can be preempted by NMI.
>
> It does? How does it return with IRQs disabled?
>
> > + */
> > +void __printk_safe_enter(void)
> > +{
> > + this_cpu_inc(printk_safe_context);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Restores local IRQs state saved in printk_safe_enter().
> > + * Can be preempted by NMI.
> > + */
>
> How does this return with irqs enabled?
ah... leftovers. thanks, will correct.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists