linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] make printk work again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:04:16 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] make printk work again

On Tue 18-10-16 19:08:30, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This basically fixes printk by evading everything it does.
> 
> There's too many problems with printk, from sleeping locks to broken console
> drivers. Stop using it.

I agree that printk is fragile and your patches are likely fine for machine
where you do kernel development. However for production servers with
hundreds of SCSI LUNs assigned I don't think it is a viable solution - I'm
pretty sure those machines would take ages to boot (if they ever boot) with
early_printk implementation. So do you intend this as "the ultimate printk
solution" or just a "kernel developers debugging aid"? :)

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR