lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:14:58 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from
 pxa2xx-cpufreq

On 19-10-16, 13:51, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/19, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> > Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> writes:
> > 
> > > On 10/18, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> > >> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> writes:
> > >> Hi Michael and Stephen,
> > >> 
> > >> I'm planing on sending a v2 next week with minor corrections, mostly in the data
> > >> tables (pxa25x_freqs and pxa27x_freqs), as testing prooved some values were wrong.
> > >> 
> > >> If you want me modify this serie, will you have time to review for next week or
> > >> should I delay the v2 posting ?
> > >> 
> > >
> > > No need to delay. clk patches look fine with a quick glance. It
> > > would be really neat if we could make cpufreq-dt work without DT.
> > > What's blocking that? OPP tables?
> > 
> > Heu I'm not the author of cpufreq-dt, so I'm not the best to answer.
> > To answer the question "without DT", it depends if you mean "with ACPI" or "with
> > platform_data" or something else.
> 
> I mean platform_data mostly. Do you use ACPI with the clk driver?

I would like to see sample code for that, as I am not sure what all changes
would be required in cpufreq-dt in that case. Yes it is more dependent on the
OPP framework than DT right now.

My first impression is that it should be doable..

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ