linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the imx-mxs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:58:25 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the imx-mxs tree

On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:47:29 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   eef0b282bb58 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Initialize all power domains")
>   f9d1f7a7ad91 ("ARM: imx: gpc: Fix the imx_gpc_genpd_init() error path")
> 
> from the imx-mxs tree and commit:
> 
>   59d65b73a23c ("PM / Domains: Make genpd state allocation dynamic")
> 
> from the pm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Thanks Stephen!

Lina, please have a look at the Stephen's fix and let me know if that
conflict should be resolved in a different way.

Thanks,
Rafael