lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:53:22 +0200
From:   Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        manjunath.goudar@...aro.org,
        Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT v2 09/17] regulator: fixed: Add over current event

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 06:46:26PM +0200, ahaslam@...libre.com wrote:
>> From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
>>
>> Some regulator supplies have an over-current pin that is
>> activated when the hw detects an over current condition.
>> When this happens, the hardware enters a current limited
>> mode.
>
> Please don't mix random enhancements like this into bigger system
> specific RFC serieses, send them separately so they're easier to spot
> and there's no confusion with dependencies and then reference them from
> the system specific series when you post that.

Ok, sorry i had mixed feelings on how to post all of it.
 there are several dependencies on the series and i  kept
all together to give the context. Do you  want me to repost the regulator
changes seperatly? I can do that, but if you  don't agree with regulator
handling overcurrent, i will have to move the over current
gpio into the driver, and there is no point on re-posting that seperatly.

Regards
Axel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ