linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: Introduce WALT hooks into core and scheduling classes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:57:59 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...eaurora.org>,
        Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
        Olav Haugan <ohaugan@...eaurora.org>,
        Syed Rameez Mustafa <rameezmustafa@...eaurora.org>,
        Joonwoo Park <joonwoop@...eaurora.org>,
        Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
        Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
        Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@....com>,
        Robin Randhawa <robin.randhawa@....com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Srinath Sridharan <srinathsr@...gle.com>,
        Andres Oportus <andresoportus@...gle.com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@...eauorora.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: Introduce WALT hooks into core and
 scheduling classes

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:10:42AM -0700, Vikram Mulukutla wrote:
> @@ -2072,13 +2078,19 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
>  	 */
>  	smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL);
>  
> +	raw_spin_lock(&task_rq(p)->lock);
> +	walt_update_task_ravg(p, task_rq(p), TASK_WAKE, walt_ktime_clock(), 0);
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&task_rq(p)->lock);
> +

Lol. funny that.

No.