lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:06:56 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:     David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 08/14] bus1: implement peer management context

David, Tom,

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:18 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com> wrote:
> +struct bus1_peer *bus1_peer_new(void)
> +{
> +       static atomic64_t peer_ids = ATOMIC64_INIT(0);
> +       const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
> +       struct bus1_peer *peer;
> +       struct bus1_user *user;
> +
> +       user = bus1_user_ref_by_uid(cred->uid);
> +       if (IS_ERR(user))
> +               return ERR_CAST(user);
> +
> +       peer = kmalloc(sizeof(*peer), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!peer) {
> +               bus1_user_unref(user);
> +               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +       }
> +
> +       /* initialize constant fields */
> +       peer->id = atomic64_inc_return(&peer_ids);

What is the purpose of this id? Do other components depend on it
and are they aware of possible overflows?
Since it is an 64bit integer overflowing it is hard but not impossible.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ