| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:14:56 -0400
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] trace-cmd record: add --cpu-list option
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:49:22 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Sorry it took so long to look at this, but I finally got around to
> it ;-)
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:47:11 -0400
> Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > With --cpu-list you can do:
> >
> > # trace-cmd record --cpu-list 1,4,10-15 [...]
> >
> > Which is much more human friendly than -M.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt | 4 +
> > trace-record.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 142 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt b/Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt
> > index b80520e..d7e806a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt
> > @@ -304,6 +304,10 @@ OPTIONS
> > executed will not be changed. This is useful if you want to monitor the
> > output of the command being executed, but not see the output from trace-cmd.
> >
> > +*--cpu-list list*::
> > + List of CPUs to be traced. The "list" argument can be comma separated
> > + (eg. 1,2,4,5), a range (eg. 1-10) or a mix of the two (eg. 1,2,10-15).
> > +
> > EXAMPLES
> > --------
> >
> > diff --git a/trace-record.c b/trace-record.c
> > index b042993..4452979 100644
> > --- a/trace-record.c
> > +++ b/trace-record.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> > #include <string.h>
> > #include <stdarg.h>
> > #include <getopt.h>
> > +#include <limits.h>
> > #include <sys/types.h>
> > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > #include <sys/time.h>
> > @@ -47,6 +48,7 @@
> >
> > #include "trace-local.h"
> > #include "trace-msg.h"
> > +#include "cpu.h"
> >
> > #define _STR(x) #x
> > #define STR(x) _STR(x)
> > @@ -179,6 +181,118 @@ static struct tracecmd_recorder *recorder;
> >
> > static int ignore_event_not_found = 0;
> >
> > +static int read_cpu_nr(const char *str, int *ret)
> > +{
> > + char *endptr;
> > + int val;
> > +
> > + errno = 0;
> > + val = strtol(str, &endptr, 10);
> > +
> > + if ((errno == ERANGE && (val == LONG_MAX || val == LONG_MIN))
> > + || (errno != 0 && val == 0))
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + if (endptr == str)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + if (*endptr != '\0')
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + *ret = val;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int set_single_cpu(const char *str, uint64_t *ret_mask)
> > +{
> > + int cpu, err;
> > +
> > + err = read_cpu_nr(str, &cpu);
> > + if (err || cpu < 0)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + cpu_set(ret_mask, cpu);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_one(char *str, char **saveptr)
> > +{
> > + int err, cpu;
> > + char *p;
> > +
> > + p = strtok_r(str, "-", saveptr);
> > + if (!p)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + err = read_cpu_nr(p, &cpu);
> > + if (err)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + return cpu;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int set_range_cpu(const char *str, uint64_t *ret_mask)
>
> ret_mask is a reference to uint64_t cpumask below.
>
> > +{
> > + int i, begin, end, err = -1;
> > + char *saveptr, *range;
> > +
> > + range = strdup(str);
> > + if (!range)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + begin = parse_one(range, &saveptr);
> > + if (begin < 0)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + end = parse_one(NULL, &saveptr);
> > + if (begin < 0)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + if (begin > end)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + for (i = begin; i <= end; i++)
> > + cpu_set(ret_mask, i);
>
> cpu_set(ret_mask, i) sets bits from begin to end in uint64_t cpumask
> from below.
>
> What happens if this range is greater than 64? We already have boxes
> that run this with 80 CPUs. Looks to be out of memory range to me.
The best solution is probably to detect the number of CPUs at run-time
and use the CPU_SET() API. The lazy and ugly solution is to just fail.
Any objections to the CPU_SET() solution?
>
> > +
> > + err = 0;
> > +
> > +out:
> > + free(range);
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int has_range(const char *str)
> > +{
> > + return strchr(str, '-') != NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_cpumask_str(const char *cpumask_str, uint64_t *ret_mask)
>
> ret_mask is a reference to uint64_t cpumask below.
>
> > +{
> > + char *saveptr, *str, *p;
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + str = strdup(cpumask_str);
> > + if (!str)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + *ret_mask = 0;
> > +
> > + p = strtok_r(str, ",", &saveptr);
> > + while (p) {
> > + if (has_range(p))
> > + err = set_range_cpu(p, ret_mask);
>
> Passing the reference of uint64_t cpumask from below to set_range_cpu()
>
> > + else
> > + err = set_single_cpu(p, ret_mask);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto out;
> > + p = strtok_r(NULL, ",", &saveptr);
> > + }
> > +
> > +out:
> > + free(str);
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline int is_top_instance(struct buffer_instance *instance)
> > {
> > return instance == &top_instance;
> > @@ -2114,6 +2228,25 @@ static char *alloc_mask_from_hex(const char *str)
> > return cpumask;
> > }
> >
> > +static char *alloc_mask_from_list(const char *cpu_list)
> > +{
> > + char *cpumask_str;
> > + uint64_t cpumask;
>
> cpumask is a simple uint64_t (64 bits)
>
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = parse_cpumask_str(cpu_list, &cpumask);
>
> Passed to parse_cpumask_str() by reference.
>
> -- Steve
>
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + die("can't parse cpumask");
> > +
> > + cpumask_str = malloc(MASK_STR_MAX);
> > + if (!cpumask_str)
> > + die("can't allocate cpumask");
> > +
> > + snprintf(cpumask_str, MASK_STR_MAX-1, "%lx", cpumask);
> > + return cpumask_str;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > static void set_mask(struct buffer_instance *instance)
> > {
> > struct stat st;
> > @@ -4136,6 +4269,7 @@ enum {
> > OPT_nosplice = 253,
> > OPT_funcstack = 254,
> > OPT_date = 255,
> > + OPT_cpulist = 256,
> > };
> >
> > void trace_record (int argc, char **argv)
> > @@ -4337,6 +4471,7 @@ void trace_record (int argc, char **argv)
> > {"stderr", no_argument, NULL, OPT_stderr},
> > {"by-comm", no_argument, NULL, OPT_bycomm},
> > {"ts-offset", required_argument, NULL, OPT_tsoffset},
> > + {"cpu-list", required_argument, NULL, OPT_cpulist},
> > {"max-graph-depth", required_argument, NULL, OPT_max_graph_depth},
> > {"debug", no_argument, NULL, OPT_debug},
> > {"help", no_argument, NULL, '?'},
> > @@ -4545,6 +4680,9 @@ void trace_record (int argc, char **argv)
> > case 'M':
> > instance->cpumask = alloc_mask_from_hex(optarg);
> > break;
> > + case OPT_cpulist:
> > + instance->cpumask = alloc_mask_from_list(optarg);
> > + break;
> > case 't':
> > if (extract)
> > topt = 1; /* Extract top instance also */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists