linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/60] block: introduce flag QUEUE_FLAG_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 30 Oct 2016 06:20:09 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
        "open list:SOFTWARE RAID (Multiple Disks) SUPPORT" 
        <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/60] block: introduce flag QUEUE_FLAG_NO_MP

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 04:08:22PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> MD(especially raid1 and raid10) is a bit difficult to support
>> multipage bvec, so introduce this flag for not enabling multipage
>> bvec, then MD can still accept singlepage bvec only, and once
>> direct access to bvec table in MD and other fs/drivers are cleanuped,
>> the flag can be removed. BTRFS has the similar issue too.
>
> There is really no good reason for that.  The RAID1 and 10 code really
> just needs some love to use the bio cloning infrastructure, bio
> iterators and generally recent bio apis.  btrfs just needs a tiny little
> bit of help and I'll send patches soon.

That is very nice of you to do this cleanup, cool!

I guess it still need a bit time, and hope that won't be the block
for the whole patchset, :-)

[linux-2.6-next]$git grep -n -E "bi_io_vec|bi_vcnt" ./fs/btrfs/ | wc -l
45

[linux-2.6-next]$git grep -n -E "bi_io_vec|bi_vcnt" ./drivers/md/ |
grep raid | wc -l
54

>
> Having two different code path is just asking for trouble in the long
> run.

Definitely, that flag is introduced just as a short-term solution.

Thanks,
Ming Lei