linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] remoteproc: Add support for xo clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:41:58 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Trilok Soni <tsoni@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] remoteproc: Add support for xo clock

On 10/31/2016 05:05 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 25 Oct 13:57 PDT 2016, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
>
>> Add xo clock support required to boot up Qualcomm ADSP processor.
>> The ADSP remoteproc driver keeps xo clock enabled until the
>> driver receives "handover" irq, in order to allow ADSP processor
>> to vote for xo clock with rpm.
> Looks good, thanks.
>
> We have to add the clock to the DT binding and run that by Rob again,
> before merging the driver and this patch.
>

Maybe we should make the xo clock required. We always have a clock for
it somewhere, either RPM controlled or as a fixed rate clock so it
should work just as well.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project